Jun 18, 2010

DRT surveys Ajax riders about route changes

Durham Region Transit is inviting Ajax bus riders to provide their two cents about recent route changes.
DRT made numerous changes to routes in May in response to the closure of Fairall Street for construction. The street is often used by buses to travel from the GO station to other parts of Ajax
The changes are meant to be temporary, but DRT is conducting a survey where the feedback might result in permanent changes to some routes.

Due on July 15, the survey is available online at durhamregiontransit.com or riders can pick up a copy from their bus driver. They can be returned to any bus driver, faxed to 905-666-6193 or mailed to: Durham Region Transit, 605 Rossland Rd. E., Box 623 Whitby, Ontario, L1N 6A3.

Link:  Durham Region Transit surveys Ajax riders about route changes

Jun 12, 2010

Bye-bye bus bays: Ottawa cutting out stops

The City of Ottawa is on a mission to eliminate bus bays that are scattered throughout the city in an effort to encourage more people to use public transit.
The city is currently doing restoration work along Greenbank Road between Baseline and West Hunt Club, including taking out the divots in the curb where buses can pull out of traffic to take on and drop off passengers.

The elimination of these bays is part of a policy the city implemented before the 2001 amalgamation, said Bay Councillor Alex Cullen, chair of the city’s transit committee.

“The city originally thought (bus bays) would be a convenient way to pick up and drop off passengers … but the buses get marooned, particularly during rush-hour traffic, and this throws them off their schedule,” Cullen said. So the city has been removing the road features when the time comes for major reconstruction.

College Councillor Rick Chiarelli does not agree with elimination of the bus bays. “We built those for a reason: so the buses could pull in and cars could keep going.”

While the intent of the policy change was to encourage people to take the bus, Chiarelli said, he does not think this is the right way to do it. Removing the bus bays will only slow other vehicle traffic, he said, which might make buses more attractive by comparison, but “I don’t think you can punish people into taking the bus.”

Cullen said the city had received some letters from drivers who thought the removal of bus bays was an inconvenience, but maintaining the reliability of the city’s transit system would be a priority.

“I think it’s important that our transit system work well, and the short inconvenience that cars will have to go through when a bus stops is minor,” Cullen said.

Rick Zarzosa, chief engineer of the city’s transit priority section, said the bus bays were being removed as part of roadway reconstruction throughout the city.

A few bus bays on Meadowlands Drive have already been removed, and those on Bronson Avenue, Hunt Club Road and March Road are next on the list.

Zarzosa said he could not provide an exact number of bus bays in the city.

“Without the bus bays, we save money on the transit-operation side and the on-winter road maintenance,” he said, adding that fewer buses were required when time was saved and buses kept to their schedules.

Link: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/bays+City+cutting+stops/3133908/story.html#ixzz0qdyyHVzt

Jun 3, 2010


On June 1st the stores at the Pickering Go Station were closed due to construction and won't open again for some months.

One major problem is that the store that sold all Durham Region Transit passes and tickets has closed and now DRT has advised that the only places to buy passes and tickets for riders using the GO Station is at the Pickering City Hall, on Glenanna north of the 401 or at the Pickering Recreation Complex which is also north of the 401 on Valley Farm Road.

Customers who come into Pickering on the GO Trains or Buses will now have to make a special trip to one of the 3 locations above to purchase fare media. This will no doubt cause some angry complaints from customers who wonder why something cannot be set up at the Go Station even if only for a few hours per day. Not only will some of these passengers have to make the extra trip but they will have to pay full fare to do so for one of the trips that won't originate at the Go Station.

The City Hall is only open Monday to Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. but the other locations are open 7 days per week and the Recreation Centre has the longest hours. Surely DRT could come up with some way to sell tickets and passes at the GO Station if only on a part time basis.

Mar 12, 2010

Bus route pitched for Scugog Island

The operators of the Great Blue Heron Charity Casino are hoping daily transit service to the Scugog Island gaming hall is in the cards.

The Mississaugas of Scugog Island First Nation have forwarded a formal request to Durham Region Transit officials, requesting that consideration be given to extending service to the gambling facility in the near future.

The transit provider has been seeking input from the public in recent weeks as it considers its options for future expansion through its long-term transit study.

In a letter to Scugog councillors dated Feb. 9, the Mississaugas council states the First Nation community and other area residents "have always had a need for a bus route that extends service to Scugog Island."

Such a service would provide residents with a connection to other areas of Durham and beyond where they could access medical appointments and other daily needs such as commuting to work and school, said the Mississaugas officials.

The letter, signed by Chief Tracy Gauthier and councillors Della Charles and Kelly LaRocca, also requests that transit officials consider routing a bus northbound on Island Road -- directly past the Great Blue Heron casino -- to the northern tip of Scugog Island before looping around to serve residents on the island's eastern shoreline.

"Such service could be extended in a number of permutations, but we believe that a case could easily be made to support a route that runs at least twice daily during the week and on weekends," state Mississaugas officials.

The Mississaugas also subtly reminded transit officials that a small portion of the revenues from the Scugog Island gaming hall are shared with Scugog and Durham.

"Given the strong partnerships that we have developed with the Region of Durham and the Township of Scugog, particularly since the advent of the casino and the distributions that flow there from, we hope to forge new ways of improving upon the lives of our constituents on both a short- and long-term basis," wrote the councillors.

A call placed to Mississaugas Chief Gauthier for further comment was not returned. A copy of the letter already included in the Scugog council agenda was instead faxed to the Star.

When preliminary work on the strategy began 18 months ago, no concerns were raised by the Mississaugas of Scugog Island or any other First Nation groups, said Durham transit's Phil Meagher.

Follow-up attempts were also made to contact the groups, but no messages were returned, said the transit system's deputy general manager of operations.

Last month, continued Mr. Meagher, DRT officials received a couple of calls from the Scugog Island First Nation requesting "bus service to the Great Blue Heron casino and also some sort of bus route on the island."

Preliminary work on bringing transit service to Scugog Island began in 2007. However, said Mr. Meagher, DRT officials were handcuffed by provincial regulations that clearly state gambling "employees and customers can't ride on the same bus together."

That stipulation has hampered the plan to date, he said.

"We know there's probably a need up there. It's a matter of money and how to implement the service and the (provincial rules)," said Mr. Meagher.

"If I put a bus on the island, do I avoid the casino?" he asked.

At some point in the future, Mr. Meagher noted, he forecasts some sort of resolution which would perhaps allow for two trips each in the morning and afternoon to the island.

"But I'm not sure when that would happen," he added, stressing a business plan would still have to be drafted and endorsed by Regional council.

As for the idea that the casino's cash contributions could influence any decisions, the deputy general manager of operations said that fact has no bearing on transit decisions.

Scugog Ward 3 Councillor Lynn Philip Hodgson, who represents Scugog Island residents, applauded the idea os a bus to the island.

"I'd certainly support it," he said, noting it was time for transit officials to "take a good, serious look at it.

"But the problem is, of course, money -- can we afford it and will there be the ridership," said the Ward 3 councillor.

He noted, however, that there were some "growing pains" when transit was initially introduced to Port Perry a few years ago.

"It started off very slowly and with very few riders, but it started to grow when word got around," said Coun. Hodgson. "It would take some time for word to get out there."

durhamregion.com | Bus route pitched for Scugog Island.

Mar 11, 2010

Mar 1, 2010

Halton council ponders regional transit system

An amalgamated transit system possibly serving Halton’s four communities of Burlington, Oakville, Milton and Halton Hills will be studied by regional staff.

Halton’s council has directed the works department to consider including an integrated regional transit system into the multi-billion dollar master plan it is developing for transportation projects over the next two decades.

Staff hopes to complete the master plan, dubbed The Road to Change, by the end of the year. Public information centres are scheduled for late March.

Currently, transit service in Halton is handled at the local municipal level, with Burlington, Oakville and Milton all operating separate systems. Halton Hills does not have a conventional transit system, but regional planning documents envision the town could have a small six-bus system by 2031 to service the approximately 25,000 extra people coming to Acton, Georgetown and area hamlets between 2015-31.

In the past decade, both York and Durham regions have created regional transit bodies, taking over the bus services offered by their local municipalities.

“I’ve been an advocate for looking at this (regional transit system) for some period of time,” said John Taylor, vice-chair of council’s planning and public works committee and a Burlington regional councillor, in an interview.

“Milton has a fledgling system, Burlington and Oakville have more sophisticated systems. Can we find a way to find efficiencies?” he asked. “I think we should have the facts in front of us.”

Taylor said a Halton regional transit system would be an intermediate step. The ultimate aim should be a seamless, GTA-wide transit system similar to what is available in Vancouver and its suburbs, he said.

Taylor’s Oakville colleague, Allan Elgar, was more circumspect of a regional transit initiative, in regards to the cost.

“Who’s going to pay?” asked Elgar in a separate interview. “I don’t believe Oakville is interested in subsidizing Halton Hills and Milton in this initiative.”

Elgar was referring to a point raised often by Oakville’s regional council members, that residents and businesses in their town, due to the higher assessment value of their properties, pay approximately 42 per cent of the property taxes that end up at the region though Oakville’s population is only 37 per cent of Halton’s total.

Elgar said Oakville Transit has also moved to a grid-based transit system designed for people to get around the town, while Burlington’s and Milton’s transit agencies still operate radial systems focused on getting commuters to GO stations.

Taylor responded to Elgar’s concerns by suggesting a regional transit system could operate like Halton’s waste collection division, with local municipalities determining the service levels they desire and paying the region accordingly.

While Halton’s transportation master plans have traditionally focused on building more roads — $1.1 billion is projected for such projects over the next 11 years — transit has been at the forefront of other regional plans.

Included in the recently passed amendment to Halton’s Official Plan, ROPA 38, is a target of having 20 per cent of all peak period trips made by transit by 2031, with automobiles used for 70 per cent of such trips and walking, bicycling and other “active transport” modes used 10 per cent of the time.

Reaching that target will require a massive sea change in both the attitudes and behaviour of Halton commuters as well as the level of transit service offered to them. In 2006, only five per cent of peak period trips were made by transit and two per cent by active transport.

The region’s plans depend on the province continuing to invest heavily in inter-regional transit, including the planned electrification of the Lakeshore West GO train line and a bus rapid transit line on dedicated lanes on Dundas Street between Halton and Kipling Station in Etobicoke.

With such investments, the region hopes 42 per cent of peak period trips made outside Halton will be made by transit in 2031. Only 11 per cent of such trips within Halton would be made by transit. Combined, the two add up to the 20 per cent transit target.

That target is not unique to Halton, as York Region, Ottawa, Waterloo Region and Markham are all aiming for the same percentage by 2031.

In the GTA, York has been the forefront of investing in a regional transit system, beginning its York Region Transit (YRT) in 2001. Over the past five years, YRT’s ridership increased 33 per cent, from 13.8 million to 18.3 million, while the region’s population only grew about 13 per cent, according to a Metroland York news report.

York’s privatized rapid transit system, VIVA, expects to be running its buses on dedicated lanes in three years, two years before a TTC subway extension to York in Vaughan is scheduled to be completed. Metrolinx, the province’s transit planning agency, and York are also planning for an extension of the TTC subway to Richmond Hill.

However, that increased level of transit service in York costs money. In 2010, property taxpayers there can expect to cover about 57 per cent of YRT’s $160-million budget this year, according to York’s budget documents. That equates to an approximate $89 per capita investment by York’s one million-plus residents. The region is projecting a YRT ridership at just over 20 million this year.

The investments haven’t had a skyrocketing effect on property taxes in York, however. That region averaged 2.725 per cent annual hikes in property taxes for regional services over the past four budgets. Halton averaged 1.5 per cent over the same period.

In Halton, which has a population just under half that of York, the three local transit systems recorded a combined ridership of 4.4 million, only a quarter of YRT’s ridership. That was split between Milton Transit with 102,000, Burlington Transit with 1.86 million and Oakville Transit with 2.44 million.

Halton residents, however, will pay less per capita for local transit this year, from a low of approximately $14.45 in Milton to a high of $74.50 in Oakville, according to 2010 budget documents listing net expenses divided by the municipalities’ estimated populations.

About one-third or more of the transit budgets in Halton is picked up by ticket fares and other revenues, something that often receives criticism from some residents who complain about seeing empty buses plying local streets.

However, determining what’s a good cost-recovery ratio for a transit system can lead to broader discussions around council tables about other programs offered by municipalities, such as recreation and leisure programs. For example, library boards in Halton receive property taxes almost equivalent to the transit systems, but have minimal cost recovery through user fees, according to budget documents.

The construction and maintenance of non-growth related roads in the region is almost fully subsidized by property taxes. While the subject of toll roads was recently brought up by members of Halton’s planning and public works committee, the discussion didn’t lead to recommendations.

Even with the amount local governments plan to spend on roads, Elgar said money won’t solve traffic jams, especially with population in Halton and around the GTA projected to continue growing in the coming decades.

“The more roads they build, it doesn’t mean the congestion will be less,” Elgar said.

If the region achieves its 20 per cent transit target, automobile trips would increase about 28 per cent by 2031 from 2006, according to statistics from the region’s transportation consultant. By reaching only a 10 per cent peak period transit split, automobile trips would increase 60 per cent over that time span.

Based on existing trends, on top of the $1.1 billion Halton Region has budgeted for transportation projects between now and 2021, it could expect to pay an additional $787 million between 2021-31, the vast majority on roads. An enhanced transit plan, based on the 20 per cent transit target, would cost $812 million over the same time period, with a greater percentage spent on transit though the majority would continue to go to roads.

The public information centres for the region’s transportation master plan, The Road to Change, are scheduled as follows (drop-in starts at 6:30 p.m. followed by presentation at 7 p.m.):

• Burlington - Tuesday, March 23 at Mainway Arena (auditorium), 4015 Mainway

• Halton Hills - Thursday, March 25 at Mold-Masters SportsPlex (Hall), 221 Guelph St.

• Milton - Tuesday, March 30 at the Milton Sports Centre (Banquet Room), 605 Santa Maria Blvd.

• Oakville - Wednesday, March 31 at the Halton Regional Centre (auditorium), 1151 Bronte Rd.

InsideHalton Article: Halton council ponders regional transit system.

Feb 23, 2010

Toronto transit union calls Liberal MPP's attack on TTC workers pathetic

The following statement is issued by Bob Kinnear, President of Toronto's transit workers' union, ATU Local 113, in response to the private member's bill introduced by MPP David Caplan to declare the TTC an "essential service" and thereby substitute binding arbitration for collective bargaining.

"Since the Liberal government assumed power over six years ago, there has been a total of 52 hours in TTC service disruptions due to job action by our union. That's an average of about one minute per day during Liberal rule. Let's compare that minute to the much greater daily delays endured by TTC riders because of the McGuinty government's unwillingness to restore provincial financial support for TTC operations that was taken away by the Conservative government of Mike Harris nearly 15 years ago.

"Every single day, TTC riders put up with service delays, mechanical breakdowns, and vehicles that are so crowded they have to leave riders stranded at bus stops for as long as 20 minutes. There are also the regular fare hikes that greatly exceed both the rate of inflation and any increase in TTC workers' wages. All these problems are the result of a provincial government that wilfully turns a blind eye to the financial stresses on public transit in Ontario's capital city. As is well-known, the TTC is the least-subsidized urban transit system in North America. That may be good for taxpayers outside of Toronto but it's bad for TTC riders.

"It is a pathetic political ploy by a former McGuinty Cabinet member to try to deflect attention away from his government's chronic negligence of environmentally-friendly public transit by attacking the legal rights of transit workers.

"I would be happy to publicly debate Mr. Caplan on which has caused TTC riders more inconvenience: the 52 hours of service disruption due to union job action during the Liberal reign, or the 52,000 hours of service cutbacks, delays, breakdowns and higher fares that can be, at least in part, attributable to lack of provincial operating funding by the McGuinty government during this same period."

Kinnear added that the union will soon be conducting a series of Town Hall meetings in Toronto at which front-line TTC workers will meet with TTC riders face-to-face to air complaints, share concerns and determine what the workers can do to improve the customer experience.

"We will commit to improving those service areas over which we have control," said Kinnear. "But we cannot take responsibility for all those areas of service problems over which we have absolutely no control. That is the responsibility of governments, including the provincial government."

NOTE: Bob Kinnear is in meetings this afternoon and will not be available for media interviews until late afternoon or early evening.

For further information: Bill Reno, (416) 223-7366

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 113 | Toronto transit union calls Liberal MPP's attack on TTC workers a \pathetic.